Criminal Appeal under Section 390 Cr.P.C. admitted by the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, due to findings not being in consonance with evidence. Application allowed.
Criminal appeal admitted; application allowed in terms of prayer clauses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
926 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 373 OF 2015
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS AJINATH MARUTI TAYADE AND ANOHTER ... APP for Applicant : Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 13th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard.
2] Perused the original record and proceedings and the findings recorded by the trial court. Prima facie, it appears that findings are not in consonance with the evidence on record. Case is established for admitting appeal. Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A)(B) and (C).
3] Application is disposed of. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 Cr.P.C. to follow before the Sessions Court, at Aurangabad.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order is in consonance with the evidence on record.
Whether the criminal appeal should be admitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Ajinath Maruti Tayade
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
