The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad heard a criminal writ petition where the petitioner alleged offences. The court held that the FIR disclosed a prima facie case needing investigation. No cause for interference was found at this stage, and the petition was rejected without granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2015
KRUSHNATH S/O AMBADAS KALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Suhas B.Ghute APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. P.J. Bharad
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 13th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard.
2] Name of the applicant is mentioned in the FIR. Specific allegations are made against him. Prima facie, offence is disclosed, which needs investigation. No case is made out for interference at this stage. Petition is rejected.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Writ Petitioner is entitled to interim relief or quashing of proceedings at the initial hearing stage.
Whether prima facie allegations in the FIR warrant immediate judicial interference without investigation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krushnath S/o Ambadas Kale
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
