Disposed

Baby Wd/O Kawdu Khodankar v. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division and Another

Bombay HC16 Apr 2015WP/5882/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging pension payment delay. Court accepted affidavit in reply showing prior order served purpose. Directed respondents to pay pension and gratuity within two months of necessary paper submission by petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to pay pension and gratuity within two months from date of submission of necessary papers by petitioner.

Baby Wd/O Kawdu Khodankar Vs Divisional… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1 wp5882.14.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.5882 OF 2014

¶4

[Baby wd/o Kawdu Khodankar .vs. Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and one]

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

¶7

Shri S.P. Sonwane, counsel for the petitioner, Shri D.P. Thakare, Additional Government Pleader for the respondent no.1, Shri P.S. Khubalkar, counsel for the respondent no.2.

¶8

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND

¶9

A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶10

DATED : APRIL 16, 2015.

¶11

Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has tendered an affidavitin-reply in the court today. The same is accepted on record.

¶12

It appears from a reading of the affidavit-in-reply and the order dated 4.3.2015 annexed thereto, it appears that the petitioner is asked to produce the relevant papers for getting the pension payment order. It is stated in the affidavit that an amount of Rs.1,913/- per month is payable to the husband of the petitioner from 3.7.2005 to 2.7.2012 and the petitioner would be entitled to an amount of Rs.25,080/- towards the payment of gratuity. It appears, on a reading of the order dated 4.3.2015, that the purpose of filing the writ petition stands served.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed by the said order, but the respondents may be directed to process the matter at the earliest and pay the benefits to the petitioner immediately.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the respondents to pay the pension and gratuity amount of the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of two months from the date of submission of the necessary papers by the petitioner to the respondent no.2. Order accordingly. No costs.

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

JUDGE

¶17

Gulande

Baby Wd/O Kawdu Khodankar v. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baby Wd/O Kawdu Khodankar v. Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur Division and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gangabai Late Gopaldasji Mohta Vs the Official Liquidator

Dr. Sunil Kumar S/O Abhilash Ram Vs Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishvavidyalaya, Wardha through Its Registrar and 2 Others

Gajanan Pandurang Mire Vs the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Social Welfare and Handicap Department, Mumbai and

Vivek Ramchandra Vishwarupe Vs Sant Gadgebaba Amravati University, Amravati through Its Registrar and Another

Dilipkumar S/O Asaram Meshram Vs Smt. Swarnalata Bhimrao Ghodeswar, Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Bhandara

Anand S/O Sitaram Gondane Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Division, Nagpur and Another