The appellant failed to appear on two occasions (5.3.2015 and the hearing date). The company appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
COMPANY APPEAL NO.12/2008 IN CAL NO.12/2005 IN OLR NO.80/2002 IN CAL 6/1990 IN CMP NO.14/1960
Smt. Gangabai w/o Late Gopaldasji Mohta ...Versus...
The Official Liquidator, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 15.04.2015
None appeared for the appellant on 5.3.2015. None appears for the appellant today also. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
Wadkar
Smt. Gangabai w/o Late Gopaldasji Mohta
The Official Liquidator, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur and others
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
