Gajanan Pandurang Mire Vs the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Social Welfare and Handicap Department, Mumbai and

¶1

1504wp3020.14.odt

¶2

1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.3020/2014

¶5

Gajanan Pandurang Mire ...Versus...

¶6

The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Social Welfare and Handicap Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai – 32 and others

¶7

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

Court's or Judge's orders

¶10

¶11

Shri S.A. Deo, Advocate for petitioner Mrs. K.S. Joshi, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3 Shri P.D. Meghe, Advocate for respondent no.4

¶12

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 15.04.2015

¶13

By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to condone the break in services and grant continuity of service to the petitioner.

¶14

The respondent no.3 has filed an affidavit-in-reply. The order of the Regional Deputy Commissioner, Social Welfare, Nagpur dated 2.3.2015 is annexed to the affidavit-in-reply. By the said order, the Regional Deputy Commissioner has directed the condonation of break in services of the petitioner within a period of fifteen days. By the said order, the Regional Deputy Commissioner has also directed the respondents to release the benefits in terms of the condonation of break in services to the petitioner at the earliest.

¶15

1504wp3020.14.odt

¶16

2

¶17

By the statements made by the respondent no.3 in the affidavit-in-reply and in terms of the order of the Regional Deputy Commissioner, the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed. We, therefore, dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the concerned respondents to pass an order condoning the breaks in services of the petitioner within a period of fifteen days and grant the consequential benefits to the petitioner, at the earliest.

¶18

In the circumstances, no order as to costs.

¶19

JUDGE JUDGE

¶20

Wadkar

Gajanan Pandurang Mire v. the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Social Welfare and Handicap Department, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajanan Pandurang Mire v. the State of Maharashtra,through Its Secretary, Social Welfare and Handicap Department, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Arun S/O Baburao Amidwar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Midc, Nagpur and Another

Puranlal S/O Sukram Ukey Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Water Conservation Department, Mumbai and 4 Others

Ku. Harshali D/O Vasant Rane, through Natural Guardian Shri Vansant Budhaji Rane Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. Mumbai and Another

Divakar S/O Panditrao Thaware Vs Secretary to Govt. of Maharashtra Home Department, Bombay and Others

Parmanand S/O Bhaulal Upwanshi Sarpanch Vs Dayaramji Tukaram Agashe and 6 Others

Shri Dnyaneshwar S/O Budhuji Dighore Vs State of Maharashtra, Grm Vikas and Panchayat Raj Department, Mumbai and Others