The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3767 OF 2015
HITENDRA VYNKATRAO MORE VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
... Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. C.D. Biradar GP for Respondents: Mr. D R Kale
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: April 13, 2015
PER COURT :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy provided under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act.
Leave granted. Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with the liberty as prayed for.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. )
( R. M. BORDE, J. )
aaa/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue alternative remedy under the Mamlatdars' Courts Act may be granted.
HITENDRA VYNKATRAO MORE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R. M. BORDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
