Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Aurangabad granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sr no. 18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2015
ANNPURNABAI DAGA PATIL & OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Manish V. Bhamre APP for Respondent/State : Mr. A.V. Deshmukh. Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. S. P. Brahme
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR,JJ. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage.
[A.M. BADAR, J] [S.S. SHINDE,J]
grt/-
Annpurnabai Dagal Patil & Others
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. Shinde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
