The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad, dismissed an application challenging the initiation of trial. Findings indicated sufficient material existed for prosecution, distinguishing cited precedent.
Application rejected as no case was made out based on available prosecution material.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2119 OF 2015
SHAIKH YUSUF S/O SHAIKH CHAND & ORS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Zaidi Ali Zeeshan M. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.L. Dhas Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. Gaware Niteen V.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: August 20, 2015
PER COURT :-
Heard.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
sga/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application is maintainable under the cited precedent given the availability of prosecution material.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
R.P. Kapur V/s State of PunjabDistinguished¶9
R.P. Kapur V/s State of Punjab reported in AIR 1960 SC 866 (1) · Who else cites this
SHAIKH YUSUF S/O SHAIKH CHAND & ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
