COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.2wp257.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 257 OF 2015. Mohd. Asad Abdul Gaffar Rangunwala .vs. State of Maharashtra & others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. H.D. Dangre, Advocate for petitioner, Mrs. K. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & SMT. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : FEBRUARY 12, 2015.
The learned Assistant Government Pleader makes a categorical statement that the application of the petitioner for renewal of mining lease and permission to operate stone crusher would be decided within a period of one week from today.
In that view of the matter, the petition has served its purpose and disposed of as such.
We make it clear that we will not entertain any application on behalf of the State for extension of time for deciding the application.
J. Judge
Judge .
Mohd. Asad Abdul Gaffar Rangunwala
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Mridula R. Bhaktar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court