In an application to condone delay for restoring a first appeal dismissed in default, the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court condoned the delay over the respondent's opposition and allowed the application.
The application for condonation of delay and restoration of the first appeal is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CAO1241-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
C.A. No.1241/2014 in MCA St. No.15510/14
in F.A.No.211/2012
(Smt. Sheela @ Shilpa Harshwardhan Moon .vs. Harshwardha Eknathji Moon. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Ms. M.D. Awachat, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Manoj P. Kariya, Advocate for Respondent no.1.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. DATED : February 10, 2015.
This is an application for condonation of delay in filing an application for restoration of the first appeal dismissed in default. The application is vehemently opposed by Mr. Kariya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.1. Taking into consideration the grounds raised in the application, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing an application for restoration of a default-dismissed first appeal should be condoned.
Smt. Sheela @ Shilpa Harshwardhan Moon
Harshwardha Eknathji Moon
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
