Allowed

Rajkumar S/O Abhinav Agav v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mumbai and 2 Oth

Bombay HC11 Feb 2015CAW/288/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant filed a civil application to correct court minutes alleging that a prior order directing a post to remain vacant was not reflected. The court acknowledged the error and allowed the application.

What did the court decide?

Civil Application allowed and necessary correction in minutes ordered to be carried out forthwith.

Rajkumar S/O Abhinav Agav Vs State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

11.02.caw.288.15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 288/2015 IN

¶3

WRIT PEITITION NO. 591/2015 (Rajkumar s/o Abhinav Agav vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of

¶5

Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr. A.S.Agrawal, Adv.for petitioner/applicant Mrs.Rashi Deshpande, AGP for respondents

¶7

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 11^th February, 2015.

¶8

Leave to correct the Civil Application,.

¶9

This Application has been filed for speaking to

¶10

the minutes to the order dated 5.2.2015.

¶11

It is the contention of the petitioner that though this Court had dictated: “Until further orders one post is directed to be kept vacant”, the same is not reflected in the said order.

¶12

The contention appears to be correct.

¶13

The Civil Application is, therefore, allowed. Necessary correction be carried out forthwith.

¶14

JUDGEJUDGE

¶15

sahare

Rajkumar S/O Abhinav Agav v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mumbai and 2 Oth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar S/O Abhinav Agav v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mumbai and 2 Oth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Sheela @ Shilpa Harshwardhan Moon Vs Harshwardhan S/O Eknathji Moon

M/S. Uniworth Ltd., Nagpur through Its Mr. Suman Bhai Patel S/O Late Bhana Patel and Anothers Vs Axis Bank Ltd., Nagpur through Branch Manager and Anothers

Bapurao S/O Shankarrao Satange Vs the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad Amravati and 2 Others

Shri Umesh S/O Purushottam Agrawal Vs State Bank of India, through Its Branch Manager, Nagpur and 2 Others

Khwaja Safiruddin S/O Shahabuddin Vs Somaiyya Polythecnic, Macron Students Academy School, Wadgaon Thr. Secty., Priti P. Ambatkar and 2

Mohd. Asad Abdul Gaffar Rangunwala Thr. His Duly Constituted Attorney, Mr. Ravi S/O R. Sharma Vs State of Maharashtra through Honable Minister/Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and 2