Petitioner filed a criminal writ petition which was subsequently withdrawn by the counsel. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.WP 234/13
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.234/2013
Ashok Kisan Bade.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri S.N. Patil, Advocate h/f Shri N.V. Gaware, Advocate
for petitioner.
Shri S.G. Nandedkar, APP for respondent no.1.
.....
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 15.01.2015
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing
the petition for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the
petition. Leave is granted. The petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
ndk/ cr151154.doc
Ashok Kisan Bade
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court