Shashikant Gajendra Pawar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC15 Jan 2015APPLN/6359/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of an application for service by paper publication due to the non-appearance of the applicants. The court directed them to furnish the respondent's correct address, failing which the underlying appeal would be dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Directed applicants to furnish respondent no.3's correct address; failed to do so by 4.2.2015 will result in dismissal of Cr.Appln.3561/13.

Shashikant Gajendra Pawar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others — Bombay HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Cr.Appln.6359/14 in Cr.Appln.3561/13

¶2

- 1 -

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.6359/2014
IN
 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3561/2013

¶6

Shashikant Gajendra Pawar
and another.

¶7

...Applicants..

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Maharashtra & others.

¶10

...Respondents...

¶11

 .....

¶12

None present for applicants.
Smt.P.J. Bharad, APP for respondent no.1.

¶13

 .....

¶14

CORAM: S.S. SHINDE &
 A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶15

DATE: 15.01.2015

¶16

ORDER :

¶17

1]When the application was called for hearing in the

¶18

morning, none appeared for the applicants. Therefore,

¶19

the application was kept back for some time. However, on
second call also after some time, none appears for the
applicants.

¶20

2]By filing this application, the applicants have
prayed that they may be allowed to serve the respondent

¶21

Cr.Appln.6359/14 in Cr.Appln.3561/13

¶22

- 2 -

¶23

no.3 by way of paper publication. The reason given in
the application is that since the applicants are not in a
position to find out the new address of the respondent
no.3, the applicants may be allowed to serve the
respondent no.3 by paper publication.

¶24

3]The prayer of the applicants, if considered under

¶25

the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,
the same cannot be granted. In that view of the matter,
the applicants will have to furnish correct and complete

¶26

address of unserved respondent no.3. Therefore, the

¶27

present application stands disposed of. The applicants

¶28

to place on record correct and complete address of the
respondent no.3 on or before 4.2.2015, failing which the
Criminal Application No.3561/2013 shall stand dismissed
as against the respondent no.3 without further reference
to Court.

¶29

ndk/ cr1511510.doc

Shashikant Gajendra Pawar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashikant Gajendra Pawar and Another v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilesh Deepak Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Saidas Raghunath Vanjari(Pawar) and Ors. Vs the State of Mah and Anr.

Ahmed Khan Amirkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

The State of Maharashtra Vs Appasaheb Balaji Parkhe and Others

Ashok Kisan Bade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Abhimanyu Ravan Ingale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others