The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a petition for withdrawal on instructions, with liberty to approach the Judicial Magistrate for redressal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
510.2014 Cri.W.P.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 510 OF 2014
Ahmed Khan s/o. Amirkhan Pathan .. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. RESPONDENTS
Ms. Poonam Bodkhe Patil, Advocate, for the Petitioner Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar, APP for Respondent – State
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M.BADAR, JJ. DATE: 14th January, 2015
PER COURT :-
1] After arguing the matter for sometime, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this Petition, with liberty to approach Judicial Magistrate First Class, Renapur, District Latur, for redressal of the grievance raised in this Petition, in the light of exposition of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P.1 .
2] The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
[A.M.BADAR, J.]
Sd/- [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
… DDC
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P.Referred¶12
(2008) 2 SCC 409 · Who else cites this
Ahmed Khan
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
