An application was heard in the Criminal Writ Petition. Upon the applicant seeking leave to withdraw it following sufficient hearing time, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
923 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 187 OF 2015
OMPRAKASH RAMAVTAR TAYAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Anand P. Bhandari APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 13th FEBRUARY, 2015.
PER COURT:
1] After hearing for sufficient time, the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of the applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the application. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[A.M. BADAR] [S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Omprakash Ramavtar Tayal
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
