Rs.1500/- in the trial Court. Defendant no.1 who moved the application, however, has not deposited Rs.1500/-. He submitted that he has taken out application dated 16.7.2013 at Exhibit 607 seeking permission of the Court to deposit balance amount of Rs.1500/-. However, the said application, till date, is not decided. 5. Mr. Mulay has invited my attention to the applications Exhibits 92, 364, 541, 395, 159, 304, 339, 311, 387, 394, 379, 519, 525, 543, 551, 552, 553, 566, 580, 588, 477, 579. He submitted that these applications are pending and are not yet decided. He has sought recalling the orders passed in Writ Petitions on the ground that unless these applications are first decided, the suit should not be decided on merits. For example, he submitted that by application at Exhibit 159 dated 12.9.2005, he has prayed for appointing handwriting expert. Defendant no.1 is relying upon the Will. He submitted that the Will is in the handwriting of defendant no.1. By that Will, all others, except defendant no.1, are disinherited. He, therefore, submitted that unless application-Exhibit 159 is decided first, suit should not proceed further. He has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of O. Bharathan Vs. K. Sudhakaran, AIR 1996 Supreme Court 1140 and in particular paragraph 20 thereof.
