exhibit U-2. By order dated 02.08.2014, that application was allowed and respondents No.1 and 2 therein were directed to allow the complainant (respondent No.1 herein) to resume duties by observing status-quo ante pending disposal of the main complaint. The order of the Labour Court was confirmed by the Industrial Court and by this Court. As the applicant has not complied the order, respondent No.1 has instituted Contempt Petition No.233 of 2015 in this Court. He submitted that the order of the Labour Court directing maintenance of status-quo ante has created problem in implementing that order. He submitted that the respondent No.1 may be directed to sign the muster maintained by the applicant. Respondent No.3 is ready and willing to pay the wages to the respondent No.1. He submitted that the applicant has no sanctioned post on which respondent No.1 can be absorbed. Applicant is getting salary grant from U.G.C. and as the respondent No.3 is ready and willing to pay wages / salary to the respondent No.1, no prejudice will be caused to the respondent No.1, and at the same time, this can be made as a workable arrangement pending the main complaint.
