Application for one-week extension to file written statement and counter-claim filed three days after the deadline was allowed in interest of justice.
Time extension of one week; order dated 23.06.2015 extended to accept documents filed on 04.09.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAW2638_15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2638 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10745 OF 2014
Dahisar Sarvoday Vividh Karyakari Shakari Soc.Ltd. and another … Applicants Vs. Ashok Kumar Chandanmal Jain and others … Respondents
Mr. Pravartak Pathak i/b. Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for Applicants. Mr. Rahul Rao i/b. M/s. N. N. Vaishnawa & Co. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : 15TH SEPTEMBER, 2015
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Pathak, learned Counsel for applicants and Mr. Rao, learned Counsel for respondent No.1.
1/3
CAW2638_15.doc
ground that the reasons stated in the application are not correct.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Minal Parab
2/3
CAW2638_15.doc
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.
3/3
Dahisar Sarvoday Vividh Karyakari Shakari Soc.Ltd.
Ashok Kumar Chandanmal Jain
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
