Decal Aluminium Industries and Export Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajesh K. Somani and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Review Petition No.55 of 2000 dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners did not appear despite notice.
High Court Review Petition No.55 of 2000 dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners did not appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RPA55.00.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.55 OF 2000 IN
APPEAL NO.363 OF 2000 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO.557 OF 1999 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.149 OF 1997
M/s Decal Aluminium Industries and Exports Pvt.Ltd. ... Petitioners v/s Mr Rajesh K. Somani and others ... Respondents
None for Petitioners. None for Respondents.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE &
B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.
DATE : 05TH AUGUST 2015
P.C. :-
neither the Petitioners nor their counsel were present when the matter
was called out and the matter was specifically placed for dismissal.
1 of 2
VRD
RPA55.00.sxw
Today also none appears for the Petitioners. Review Petition is
dismissed for want of prosecution.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (V.M. KANADE J.)
2 of 2
VRD
M/s Decal Aluminium Industries and Exports Pvt.Ltd.
Mr Rajesh K. Somani and others
V.M. Kanade
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court