Petitioner sought leave to withdraw its writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal and ordered the return of financial bid documents to Respondent No. 1, disposing of the matter.
Leave to withdraw the writ petition allowed; financial bid documents to be returned to Respondent No. 1.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPL. 1358-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) No. 1358 OF 2015
Varian Medical Systems Particle Therapy GmH ... Petitioner
Vs.
Tata Memorial Centre & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. D. J. Khambatta, Sr. Counsel a/w Mahesh Londhe, Ms. C. Birbal i/b Sanjay Udeshi & Co., for the Petitioner.
Mr. Prasad Dhakephalkar, Sr. Counsel a/w Agnel Carneiro i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla and Craigie Blunt and Caroe, for Respondent No. 1. Mr. M. S. Bharadwaj, for Respondent No. 2 – UOI.
Mr. Nitin Dakre, Head Site Solution Group, India from Petitioner - present
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 4, 2015 PC.
. Learned senior counsel, on instruction from Mr. Nitin Dakre, Head Site Solution Ground, India from Petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Writ petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Financial bid documents be returned to Respondent No. 1. Writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms..
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Varian Medical Systems Particle Therapy GmH
Tata Memorial Centre
Respondent No. 2
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
