The court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to approach the High Power Committee within four weeks for a hearing on merits.
Petitioner directed to approach the High Power Committee by filing an application within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 1210-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1210 OF 2015
Smt. Mumtaz Jamal Ali Siddi ... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Officer, SRA & Ors. ... Respondents ***
Mr. Sanjiv Sawant, for the Petitioner. Mr. Vijay Patil, for Respondent No. 1. Mr. S. P. Thorat, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. P. R. Kadam, for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 4, 2015 PC.
. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of the petition. It is submitted that the grievance of the can be looked into by the High Power Committee. We see considerable force in this submission of the learned counsel. We, therefore, direct the Petitioner to approach the High Power committee by filing application within 4 weeks. If such an application is made, the same may be decided by the High Power Committee, by giving hearing to both the parties, on merits and in accordance with law, within 12 weeks thereafter. All contentions raised by both the parties in this petition are kept open
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grievance is maintainable as a writ petition or should be approached via the High Power Committee.
Smt. Mumtaz Jamal Ali Siddi
The Chief Officer, SRA
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
V. M. Kanade
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
