The High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw Public Interest Litigation No. 44 of 2015 and granted leave to pursue alternative remedies.
Leave granted for withdrawal with liberty to avail alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil44.15
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 44 OF 2015
DATTATRAYA KESHAVRAO SHRIKHANDE AND ANOTHER VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
... Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Thombre S. S. GP for Respondents 1 to 5: Mr. D.R. Kale
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27th APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this P.I.L. with liberty to avail alternate remedy in accordance with law. Leave granted with liberty as prayed
for. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
rlj/
Dattatraya Keshavrao Shrikhande and Another
State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
