Disposed
Praveen S/O Kishore Dahat v. City of Nagpur Corporation, through Its Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur, and Others
Bombay HCPIL/101/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 24.04.pil.101.13.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.101 /2013
( Praveen s/o Kishore Dahat vs. City og Nagpur Corporation Nagpur and 5 others )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. N.A.Chawhan, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.M.Puranik, Advocate for respondent no.1 Mr. N.A.Padhye, Adv.for Respondent no. 3 Mr.D.P.Thakre, AGP for Respondent no.5-State
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATED : 24th April, 2015.
Heard.
The learned counsel for the respondents states that the cause for filing the Public Interest Litigation has been rendered infructuous as the tender challenged by the petitioner in the P.I.L. has been scrapped and a fresh tender was floated. It is stated that subsequent tenders are challenged at the instance of some other parties in P.I.L. Nos.117/2013 and 118/2013 and those matters are admitted.
In view of the aforesaid statement, we dispose of the Public Interest Litigation, with no order as to costs.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Praveen s/o Kishore Dahat
City of Nagpur Corporation Nagpur
5 others
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court