The writ petition regarding the blacklisting of the petitioner firm by the respondent Corporation stands disposed of as the impugned order of blacklisting was withdrawn by the Corporation via a resolution on 16.4.2015.
The writ petition is disposed of as the grievance is redressed by the withdrawal of the blacklisting order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1205.15
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1205 OF 2015
SAMIKSHA CONSTRUCTION CO. THANE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for the petitioner: Mr. N.T. Tribhuvan AGP for respondents: Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for respondent No.2: Mr. N.N. Desle
CORAM : R. M. BORDE AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27th APRIL, 2015
P.C. :-
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation informs that the impugned order in respect of black listing of the petitioner firm is withdrawn by the Municipal Corporation by adopting Resolution on 16.4.2015. As such, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition stands redressed. It would be open for the petitioner to persuade the Municipal Corporation for release of balance amount receivable by the petitioner towards the work carried out. Writ petition stands disposed of.
rlj/
Samiksha Construction Co. Thane
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
