Dismissed
Mr. Hemant Baburao Patil v. Union of India, through Office Attorney General and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/225/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL225.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.225 OF 2014
| Mr Hemant Baburao Patil v/s |
… Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Union of India and others | … Respondents |
Mr R.N. Kachare for Petitioner.
Mr Parag Vyas with Mr Mohamedali M. Chunawalla for Respondent No.1. Mr Pradeep Rajgopal for Respondent No.2. Mr Shekhar Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State.
CORAM: MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
DATE : 3 MARCH 2015
P.C.:
The learned counsel for respondent No.2 – Chief Election
Commissioner of India, invites our attention to the judgment dated 5 February 2014 of the Division Bench of this Court at Aurangabad in PIL No.67 of 2011. Having gone through the said judgment, we find
that the controversy raised in the present PIL is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court at Aurangabad in PIL No.67 of 2011. After having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
1 of 2
VRD
PIL225.14
the stand of the Chief Election Commissioner of India, this Court at Aurangabad dismissed the PIL. Following the said decision, we dismiss this PIL.
CHIEF JUSTICE
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
2 of 2
VRD
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
PIL No.67 of 2011Followed¶12
Mr Hemant Baburao Patil
Union of India
Chief Election Commissioner of India
State
Mohit S. Shah
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court