Appeal against arbitration award dismissed for default due to repeated non-appearance by appellants. Court noted missing documents but allowed respondents to seek permission for secondary evidence.
Appeal dismissed for default; cross objections disposed of subject to future application for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 APP.720.2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.720 OF 2005 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO.229 OF 2004
Ashok Gupta and others Appellants
versus Jayesh Himatlal Pandya and others Respondents
None for the Appellants. Mr.R.S.Jaisinghania with Mrs.Jacinta D'Silva for Respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.
DATE : 4 March 2015
PC :
The appeal was notified for seven times in the last six months. None appeared for the appellants on six occasions. Yesterday also, none appeared for the appellants. Hence, the matter was ordered to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, none appears for the appellants.
2 of 2 APP.720.2005
proposed to initiate disciplinary action against two officials on administrative side.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.)
MST
Ashok Gupta and others
Jayesh Himatlal Pandya and others
Mohit S. Shah
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
