Disposed

Vimukta Jati, Bhatkya Jamati Ashram Shala Karmpachari Sanghatana through Shri.Arun J. Bansod and an v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary of Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Other

Bombay HC4 Mar 2015PIL/116/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition regarding surplus teachers in grant-in-aid schools was disposed of as respondent affidavit clarified that public exchequer will not pay salaries for non-accommodated recruits, rendering the matter devoid of controversy.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vimukta Jati, Bhatkya Jamati Ashram Shala… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

04.03.pil.116.13.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 116 /2013 (Vimukta Jati, Bhatkya Jamati Ashram Shala Karmachari Sanghtana and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others )

¶4

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶5

Mr.S.U.Nemade, Adv.for petitioner/s Mr. A.D.Sonak, A.G.P. for respondents

¶6

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 4th March, 2015.

¶7

Heard.

¶8

The petition was filed with a grievance that though there are various surplus teachers in various schools on grant-in-aid basis, without absorbing the said surplus teachers, the Management of various schools were indulging into recruitment process.

¶9

In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos. 1,4,5 and 6, it has been categorically stated that if any appointments are made by the Management without accommodating the surplus teachers, the salary of such teachers would not be paid by the public exchequer.

¶10

In that view of the matter, nothing survives to be decided in this petition. Petition stands disposed of.

¶11

JUDGEJUDGE

¶12

sahare

Vimukta Jati, Bhatkya Jamati Ashram Shala Karmpachari Sanghatana through Shri.Arun J. Bansod and an v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary of Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vimukta Jati, Bhatkya Jamati Ashram Shala Karmpachari Sanghatana through Shri.Arun J. Bansod and an v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary of Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Other

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Hemant Baburao Patil Vs Union of India, through Office Attorney General and Ors.

Vijaykumar Bhikaji Marathe Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Vijaykumar Bhikaji Marathe Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Pradeep Purshottam Thakkar Vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

Datta Sitaram Faade and 2 Others Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Ministry of Food and Civil Supplies Department, Mumbai

Datta Sitaram Faade Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Minstry of Food and Civil Supplies Department, Mumbai

Mohan Marotrao Karemore Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Maharashtra Revenue Department, Mumbai and Others

Shri. Kiran Lavhaji Madane and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Laxmibai Wd/O Ishwarchand Joshi and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department,Mumbai and Other

Avinash Trimbarao Begade and Others Vs Maroti Govinda Dhiwar (Dead), Kalavati Bewa Maroti Shivarkar and Others

Avinash Trimbarao Begade and Others Vs Maroti Govinda Dhiwar (Dead), Kalavati Bewa Maroti Shivarkar and Others

Vinod S/O Bhagwandasji Batra and 23 Others Vs the Appropriate Authority of State Government Under Fire Prevention and Life Safety, and Another

Ku. Neeta Amritlal Shahu, (Mrs. Neeta Vinod Gupta), Nagpur Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and 6 Others

Ku. Neeta Amritlal Shahu, (Mrs. Neeta Vinod Gupta), Nagpur Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and 6 Others