The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad granted relief to the petitioner by allowing them to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation No. 5 of 2013, thereby disposing of the matter.
Leave to withdraw the PIL granted; case disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5 OF 2013
NITIN MADHAVRAO THORAT
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Dound Patil h/f Mr. N.B
Narwade
ASG for Respondents: Mr. S.B.Deshpande AGP for Respondents-State : Mrs. A.V.Gondhalekar
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: March 25, 2015
PER COURT :-
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation.
Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of as
withdrawn.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. )
( R. M. BORDE, J. )
aaa/-
NITIN MADHAVRAO THORAT
THE UNION OF INDIA
R. M. BORDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
