The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed. A pending civil application does not survive the dismissal and is disposed of. The court held that interference was unnecessary as inquiry proceedings under section 39 were concluding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
LPAST/30521/2012
PACHORA TALUKA CO-OP. EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS VERSUS
SAHEBRAO GAJMAL PATIL AND ANR
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. M.S. Deshmukh h/f Mr. S.S. Advocate for Respondent 1 : Mr. M.M. Joshi
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & V.K. JADHAV, JJ. Dated: March 25, 2015
PER COURT :-
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
aaa/-
PACHORA TALUKA CO-OP. EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS
SAHEBRAO GAJMAL PATIL AND ANR
R. M. BORDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
