Dismissed
Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar v. the Chief Secretary Govt. of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/2/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bench held that since the petitioner conceded the required distance between the railway booking office and the market boundary, the grievances in the PIL do not survive. The petition and connected motions were disposed of, and ad-interim relief was vacated.
What did the court decide?
The PIL and Notices of Motion (No.95 of 2012 and 336 of 2014) disposed of. Ad-interim relief vacated.