This court disposed of a chamber summons seeking clarification on whether new applicants were bound by consent terms from a related writ petition. The court held that since these applicants were not parties to that petition, the consent order did not bind them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chswl-49.15
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS (L.) NO.49 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3093 OF 2014
Sunny Manoj Patel and Ors. … Applicants In the matter between Sunil Babani H.U.F., … Petitioner Through its Karta Mr. Sunil Babani
Vs.
Municipal Corporation of Greater of Mumbai and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Vijay Waghela, for the Applicants.
Mr. Birendra Saraf a/w Mr. Chirag Modi i/by Mr. Dushyant Purekar, for Petitioner in WP/3093 of 2014.
Mr. N.V. Gangal for the Respondent Nos.2 to 42. Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondent – BMC.
Mr. Gaurav Joshi, Senior Counsel i/b Mr. Anil D'Souza, for Respondent No.43.
Mr. Mrugank Shah, for Respondent No.44 to 52.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.P. BHANGALE, JJ. DATE : 8th APRIL, 2015
P.C.
. The learned counsel representing the parties to the consent terms filed in the Writ Petition state that the Applicants are not bound by the consent terms and the consent order passed in the Writ Petition. We accept the said statement.
(A.P. BHANGALE, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
1 of 1
Sunny Manoj Patel and Ors.
Sunil Babani H.U.F.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay
A.S. Oka
A.P. Bhangale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
