This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.4PIL15.15
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
P.I.L. NO. 15 OF 2015
(Kishor Motilal Kapoor .vs. The State of Maharashtra & others)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mrs. Smita Sarode Singalkar, Advocate for petitioner. Mrs. K. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & S.B.SHUKRE, JJ. DATE : APRIL 1, 2015 .
After hearing the learned Counsel for petitioner, she fairly states that information under the Right to Information Act is still awaited and seeks liberty to approach again after complete information is received.
As proceedings are already registered as P.I.L.,
learned A.G.P. appearing for respondents has no objection.
As it is PIL, we grant request as made.
Accordingly, it is disposed of with liberty to file
fresh on same cause with proper data.
JUDGE JUDGE
J.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishor Motilal Kapoor
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
S.B. SHUKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
