The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court granted liberty to withdraw the public interest litigation, disposing of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) PIL No. 129 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Public Interest Litigation No. 129 of 2014
Uttam s/o. Manohar Kachre.
.. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Department of Milk, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32, & 6 others.
.. Respondents.
Mr. Nitin K. Chaudhari, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. M.B. Gangwal (Patni), Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 5.
Respondent no.6 served (Absent).
Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate, for respondent no.7.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY 2015
PER COURT :
PIL No. 129 of 2014
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / PIL129.14
Uttam s/o. Manohar
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. Shinde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
