The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a criminal writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to take further remedy on filing of a charge sheet.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate authority upon filing of charge sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 211 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 211 of 2015
Vishal Gangadhar Dadewad. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through Investigating Officer, Palam Police Station, Taluka : Palam, District : Parbhani, & another. .. Respondents.
Mr. Subhash V. Mundhe, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mrs. M.B. Gangwal (Patni), Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.1 - State.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 24TH FEBRUARY 2015
PER COURT :
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 211 of 2015
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE )
JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP211.15
Vishal Gangadhar Dadewad
The State of Maharashtra
Investigating Officer, Palam Police Station
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
