Disposed

Vikas Madhukar Ambade v. District Collector, Raigad and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2015PIL/7/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of PIL No.7 of 2012 and connected civil applications as a subsequent order by the District Collector survived. The court directed the Tahsildar, Roha to file an affidavit regarding compliance with removal of encroachments by March 30, 2015.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Tahsildar, Roha to file an affidavit on compliance with encroachment removal by March 30, 2015.

Vikas Madhukar Ambade Vs District Collector, Raigad and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2015)

pil7

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.7 OF 2012WITH
 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.81 OF 2013 WITH
 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.108 OF 2013

¶5

Vikas Madhukar Ambade ...Petitioner
vs.
District Collector, Raigad & Ors. ...Respondents

¶6

Mr.Suhas Devkar i/b Mr.C.G.Gavnekar for the
petitioner

¶7

Mr.Sachin Pawar for the applicant in CAI 81 of 2013
Mr.Kuldeep pawar i/b Mr.S.M.Gorwadkar for the
respondent Nos.7,8,10,11,13 and 18.
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and
for applicant in CAI 108 of 2013.

¶8

Ms Teja Katdare for respondent No.6

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
 A.K.MENON, JJ.
 DATE : FEBRUARY 23, 2015

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1The learned counsel representing the applicants
in Civil Application No.81 of 2013 has placed on
record a copy of the order dated 15th April 2013
passed by the Collector of the District Raigad. It
appears from the order that the petitioner was a
party to the proceedings before the District
Collector. By the said order, some of the illegal
structures were ordered to be considered for
regularisation and a direction has been issued for
removal of encroachment on the land bearing CTS
No.1143 (Original Survey No.89-A) by following a
procedure under section 50 of the Maharashtra land

¶12

pil7

¶13

¶14

Revenue Code,1966.

¶15

2Therefore, nothing will survive in this
petition considering the prayers made in this
petition. However, the State Government will have to
file a report as regards the compliance with
direction to remove the encroachments on the land
bearing CTS No.1143. If the petitioner is aggrieved
by any part of the order dated 15th April 2013, it is
for him to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance
with law.

¶16

3Accordingly, we pass the following order:

¶17

(I)PIL is disposed of in the light of the
order dated 15th April 2013;

¶18

(II)It will be open for the petitioner to
challenge the said order in accordance with law
if he is aggrieved by the said order;

¶19

(III)We direct the Tahsildar,Roha to file an
affidavit within a period of one month from
today reporting compliance with the directions
issued by the District Collector, Raigad for
removal of the encroachments on CTS No.1143;

¶20

(IV)Civil Application Nos.81 and 108 of 2013 do
not survive and the same are disposed of;

¶21

(V)For considering the compliance affidavit,
the petition shall be listed on 30th March 2015
under the caption `Directions'.

¶22

(A.K.MENON,J.)

¶23

(A.S.OKA,J.)

Vikas Madhukar Ambade v. District Collector, Raigad and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas Madhukar Ambade v. District Collector, Raigad and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Bhimrao Pingal and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra

K. Ramachandra Bhat Vs the Government of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bhaskar Ganesh Datar Vs the Collector-Collector Officer,Ratnagiri and Ors.

Hiranand Kimatram Aswani Vs Commissioner, Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, Pimpri

Uttam Manohar Kachre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pundlik S/O Baliram Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Public Works Deparment, Mumbai and 4 Others

Shri. Chetan S. Trivedi Vs the Union of India, Ministry of Railways (Railway Board), India, through Chairman and Anr.

Giridhar Chaturvedi Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Kausar Baug Co-Operative Housing Society and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and Ors.

Sampatrao Balkrishna Suryavanshi Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Anr.

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited Vs Sarpanch, Grampanchayat, Nagaon and Ors.

Bipin Mohanlal Thakker and 2 Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Bruhanmumbai and 3 Ors.

Manubhai Paragji Vashi Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

R. v. Construction Vs Nashik Municipal Corporation and Ors.