IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp5452.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.5452 OF 2014
(Kranti Shikshan Sanstha, through its Secretary ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Ministry of Higher & Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another)
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the petitioner, Mrs. K.S. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondent No.1, Shri Bhanudas Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK &
A.M. BADAR, JJ. DATE : 23-04-2015.
Shri Anand Parchure, the learned Advocate for the petitioner states that since it is stated in the affidavit-in-reply filed on behalf of the State Government that the proposal of the petitioner was returned to the respondent-University for removal of deficiencies, the petitioner would pursue the matter with the respondent-University. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in this background.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted.
Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE
pma
Kranti Shikshan Sanstha
State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
