The High Court of Bombay disposed of a suit and a notice of motion based on settled consent minutes signed by Defendant No. 2 on behalf of all defendants.
The Suit and Notice of Motion were disposed of in terms of the Consent Minutes and Consent Terms signed by the Defendant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
910-SL-766-15&NMSL-2041-15.DOC
Sharayu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 766 of 2015
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2041 OF 2015
Jigna Mahesh Thaker
Versus
Heena Builders & Ors.
…Plaintiff
…Defendants
Mr. Sanjay Jain, i/b M/s. LJ Law, for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Shailesh Shah, Senior Advocate, i/b J.S. Saluja, for the
Defendants No. 1 to 3.
Mr. Bharat Mehta, for the Defendant No. 4.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 14th August 2015
PC:-
1.The Suit is settled. Consent Minutes are tendered as are
Consent Terms. Defendant No. 2 is personally present in Court.
He has signed the Minutes and the Consent Terms for himself and
also on behalf of Defendants No. 1 and 3. He is authorised to do so.
2.There will be an order in terms of the Minutes disposing of
the suit in accordance with the Consent Terms.
1 of 2
910-SL-766-15&NMSL-2041-15.DOC
3. In view of disposal of the Suit, nothing further survives in the Notice of Motion and the same is disposed of as such.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court