Notice of Motion withdrawn under Order XXXIX Rule 1A CPC. Applicant's intervention to withdraw instruction accepted in Bombay HC. Costs to respondent dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-NMS320-15.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 320 OF 2015
IN
SUIT NO. 224 OF 1961
Shaban Khan...Applicant
In the matter between
Madhusudan Narayanlal Pittie…Plaintiff
Versus
Maheshchanraj Agarwal & Ors.…Defendants
Mr. A.A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Akshay Shinde,
for the Applicant.
Mr. N. Walawalkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Dhun Chapger, i/b
M/s. D.J. Kamdin & Co., for Defendant No. 4 in S/224/1961.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:12th August 2015
PC:-
1.Mr. Kumbhakoni, learned Senior Advocate for the Applicant,
states that he has written instructions to withdraw the Notice of
Motion. This is stated in the Applicant’s letter dated 12th August
2015 to his Advocate.
1 of 2
903-NMS320-15.DOC
2.Mr. Walawalkar, learned Senior Advocate for Defendant No.
4 in the Suit has instructions to press for costs.
3.The Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn
unconditionally. The application for costs is rejected.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Shaban Khan
Madhusudan Narayanlal Pittie
Maheshchanraj Agarwal
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court