Disposed
Vandana Ravindra Pujari v. Praveen Ramesh Kunder and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCCST/82/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-CST82-15.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 82 OF 2015
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 93 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 979 OF 2012
Vandana Ravindra Pujari
Versus
…Plaintiff
Praveen Ramesh Kunder & 2 Ors.…Defendants
Mr. Vijay Prakash Yadav, for the Applicant.
Mr. Mayur Joshi, i/b M/s. V.S. Legal Associates, for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 14th August 2015
PC:-
1.There was an inadvertent error on the part of the Advocate’s
Office which has necessitated filing of this Chamber Summons.
The Chamber Summons is, for the reasons set out in the Affidavit
in Support, made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2.Amendment to be carried out, without need of re-
verification, on or before 24th August 2015. Amended Petition to be
1 of 2
917-CST82-15.DOC
served on the Caveators / Defendants on or before 31st August
2015.
3.The Chamber Summons is disposed of in these terms with
no order as to costs. List the Suit for framing issues on 4th
September 2015.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Vandana Ravindra Pujari
Praveen Ramesh Kunder
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court