Notice of Motion seeking condonation of 81 days delay in filing Central Excise Appeal was allowed. Court satisfied with reasons in affidavit-in-support granting prayer clause (a).
Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a); counsel to file Vakalatnama within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
432-15-nma=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 432 OF 2015 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 43 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Central Excise .. Applicant
In the matter between
The Commissioner of Central Excise
.. Appellant
v/s.
M/s. Mukand Ltd. ..Respondent
Mr. Kirankumar Phadke for the applicant Mr. P.V. Patankar for the respondent
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA &
G.S. KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 4th DECEMBER, 2015.
P.C.
undertakes to file his Vakalatnama within one week from today.
filing the accompanying Central Excise Appeal. We are satisfied
with the reasons indicated in the affidavit-in-support of the notice
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
432-15-nma=.doc
of motion, explaining the delay in filing the appeal.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing Central Excise Appeal is warranted given the reasons provided.
The Commissioner of Central Excise
M/s. Mukand Ltd.
M.S. Sanklecha
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
