The single bench held that a notice of motion wrongly numbered and previously disposed of under a different number is placed on record by mistake and must be rejected.
The notice of motion is held to be wrongly on board and is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4072-09-nma=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4072 OF 2009 IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2073 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai .. Applicant
v/s.
Metro Motors Auto
..Respondent
None for the applicant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 4th DECEMBER, 2015.
P.C.
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
4072-09-nma=.doc
not Notice of Motion No.4072 of 2009. The Notice of Motion
No.4073 of 2009 has already been disposed of on 29th July, 2011.
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice of motion numbered as No.4072 of 2009 is properly placed on record given an earlier report indicating the correct number is 4073 of 2009.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
Metro Motors Auto
M.S. Sanklecha
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
