The applicant appeared without counsel on a notice of motion pertaining to income tax appeals for the year 2004. The matter was dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3825-04-nma-c=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3825 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 572 OF 2001 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3826 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 571 OF 2001
Ramdas Swamyya .. Applicant v/s. The Income Tax Officer & Anr. ..Respondents
Mr. V.S. Hadade for the applicant
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & G.S. KULKARNI, J.J.
DATED : 20th NOVEMBER, 2015.
P.C.
“No adjournment will be granted for any reason in notices of motion of the year 2000 to 2008 and the Court shall proceed to hear these matters and pass necessary orders.”
1 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
3825-04-nma-c=.doc
(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2 of 2
Uday S. Jagtap
Ramdas Swamyya
The Income Tax Officer
Anr.
M.S. SANKLECHA
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
