The Family Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear on multiple dates despite the respondent being represented.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fca-111.08
ash
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.111 OF 2008
Shri Prakash Raghunath Jagtap .. Appellant Vs Mrs. Laxmi Prakash Jagtap. .. Respondent
None for the Appellant. Shri A.P. Vanarase for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 15TH JANUARY 2015
P.C.
. When the Appeal is called out, none appears for the Appellant. The Advocate for the Respondent is present.
Shri Prakash Raghunath Jagtap
Mrs. Laxmi Prakash Jagtap
A.S. OKA
A.K.MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
