The High Court Bench made Rule 141(2) absolute in a Civil Application challenging a decision regarding legal representatives, finding that the averments showed sufficient cause.
Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b); amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caw-355.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.355 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5403 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Kishor S. Patil for the Applicants. Shri A.I. Patel, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Shri Rupesh Lanjekar for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.LACHLIYA, JJ DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER 2015
P.C.:
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the learned counsel appearing for the proposed legal representatives. In view of the averments made in the Application, sufficient cause is made out. The Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
2
caw-355.15
ash
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application based on sufficient cause should be made absolute.
A.S. Oka
V. Lachliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court