Due to non-appearance of counsel for the applicant, the civil application was dismissed as non-prosecuted. No substantive legal proposition or ruling on merits was rendered by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
caw-2137.15
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2137 OF 2015
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5255 OF 2013
Hindu Janjagruti Samiti … Applicant Versus Union of India and Ors. … Respondents
None for the Applicant. Ms. J.N. Pandhi, for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP, for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2015
P.C.
. On the last date, the learned counsel appearing for the
Respondents had made a statement that the concerned authority was willing to give hearing to the Applicant. To enable the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant to take instructions, the application was adjourned till today. None appears for the Applicant. Hence, we dismiss the application for non-prosecution.
(V.L. ACHLIYA, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
1 of 2
2
caw-2137.15
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed
Judgment/order.
2 of 2
Hindu Janjagruti Samiti
Union of India
A.S. OKA
V.L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
