Disposed

Shri Shaukat Gulam Hesein Lalani v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Sept 2015WP/9088/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed regarding non-hearing of stay application in pending appeal under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Court directed Appellate Authority to decide interim relief within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear on 22/09/2015; Appellate Authority to decide interim relief within two weeks.

Shri Shaukat Gulam Hesein Lalani Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2015)

ash

wp-9088.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9088 OF 2015

¶5

Shri Shaukat Gulam Husein Lalani. .. Petitioner Vs State of Maharashtra and Others. .. Respondents

¶6

Shri Drupad S. Patil for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent State.

¶7

CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.LACHLIYA, JJ DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER 2015

¶8

P.C.

¶9

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondents.

¶11

The grievance in the Petition is that though the Appeal against the impugned order under Sub-section (7) of Section 48 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is pending before the SubDivisional Officer, even the Application for stay has not been heard. The learned AGP has no instructions about the status of the pending Application about the interim relief.

¶12

2 wp-9088.15

¶13

ash

¶14

Hence, the Petition is disposed of by passing the following

¶15

order:

¶16

ORDER :

¶17

(a) We direct the Petitioner to appear before the Appellate Authority on Tuesday the 22^nd September 2015 at 11.00 a.m.;

¶18

(b) The Petitioner shall produce an authenticated copy of this order before the Appellate Authority;

¶19

(c) The Appellate Authority shall decide the prayer for interim relief in the pending Appeal as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of two weeks from 22^nd September 2015;

¶20

(d) The Appellate Authority is bound to consider the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Promoters and Builders Association of Pune v. State of Maharashtra and Others (Civil Appeal No.10717 of 2014 and other connected Appeals) dated 3^rd December 2014;

ash

wp-9088.15

(e) All contentions of the Petitioner on merits are kept open;

¶25

(f) The Petition is disposed of on above terms.

¶26

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J) ( A.S. OKA, J )

ash

wp-9088.15

Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.

Shri Shaukat Gulam Hesein Lalani v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Shaukat Gulam Hesein Lalani v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Forest and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hadapsar Industrial Estate Vs the President, Pune Cantonment Board and Ors.

M/S. Kutir Builders and Developers Vs Deputy Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, Thane and Ors.

Hindu Janjagruti Samiti, through Shivaji Girjappa Vatkar Vs Union of India, through Ministry of Communication and Information Technology and Ors.

Baburao Ramchandra Vhatkar and Ors. Vs Jawaharnagar Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.

Baburao Ramchandra Vhatkar and Ors. Vs Jawaharnagar Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Ors.

Dnyanoba Marippa Waghmare Vs the Municipal Corporation for Gr.Mumbai