Allowed amendment of the writ petition on the basis of events during its pendency, directing parties to file a reply within two weeks.
Application allowed; order carried out within two weeks; reply to be filed on or before 21st October, 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2368 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5569 OF 2013
Suryakant Tarachand Bhatewara and Ors. ..Applicants. V/s. State of Maharashtra and Ors. ..Respondents.
..Respondents.
Mr.Joel John Carlos i/b. Mr.Vikram Chavan for the applicants Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2015
P.C. :-
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned AGP appearing for the first to third respondents. Amendment is sought on the basis of events which have allegedly taken place during the pendency of the writ petition. Hence amendment deserves to be granted without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties in the main petition. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Reply to the amended petition shall be filed on or before 21st October, 2015. Place the petition on 25th October, 2015 in the category of 'fresh matters'.
1/2
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that this Judgment / Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Judgment / Order.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant an amendment application filed in light of events during the pendency of the main petition.
Suryakant Tarachand Bhatewara and Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S.Oka
V.L.Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
