The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.281 OF 2014
Ramchandra Barku Gatkal V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr.Sham V. Walve for the petitioner. Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND V.L.ACHLIYA, JJ.
DATED : 14TH SEPTEMBER, 2015
P.C. :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(V.L.ACHLIYA, J.) ( A.S.OKA. J.)
1/2
C E R T I F I C A T E
Certified to be true and correct copy of original signed
Judgment / Order.
2/2
Ramchandra Barku Gatkal
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S.Oka
V.L.Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
