In this application for bail and a direction for conducting a narco test on witnesses, the High Court disposed of the petition, observing that the trial in Sessions Case No. 275 of 2011 was already in progress with several witnesses examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-ba-534-2015.doc
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.534 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or Judge’s orders orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Ms. Beerta Bajwa, for the Applicant.
Mr. J.H. Ramugade, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATED: JULY 14, 2015
. This application is moved by the applicant/accused Dinesh Wayse praying for Narco Test of the eye witnesses and the victim in the case. He also prayed for bail as he is falsely implicated in this case.
Vishal 1 of 2
18-ba-534-2015.doc
examined and 5 witnesses have remained to be examined.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
Vishal 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused who is falsely implicated.
Whether the application for narco test of eye witnesses and the victim is maintainable.
Dinesh Wayse
State
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
