Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Mohd Azim Raine Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2015)

Home
Bombay HC
2015
Mohd Azim Raine Vs the State of MaharashtraMohd Azim Raine v. the State of Maharashtra

Disposed

Mohd Azim Raine v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC14 Jul 2015APPP/357/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal application filed by the accused seeking relaxation of the attendance condition under the anticipatory bail order. Court relaxed the condition directing the accused to appear at the police station every Monday and Friday till filing of chargesheet, noting chargesheet was not filed.

What did the court decide?

Condition of attendance in para 4 of order dated 1.8.2014 in connected Application No.914 of 2014 is relaxed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Condition of attendance in para 4 of order dated 1.8.2014 in connected Application No.914 of 2014 is relaxed.

Issue for consideration

Whether the condition of attendance within a specific time frame in the anticipatory bail order be relaxed given the non-filing of the chargesheet. +1 more

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The application for relaxation of the condition under order dated 1.8.2014 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.914 of 2014, which required the applicant to attend police station every Monday and Friday till filing of chargesheet, was allowed. The High Court relaxed the condition in view of the fact that the chargesheet was not yet filed by the police.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

Sherla V.

appp.357.2015_prodn.1.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.357 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.914 OF 2014

Mohd. Azim Raine

... Applicant

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

... Respondent

Mr.R.V. Gupta for the Applicant Ms.R.V. Newton, APP, for Respondent – State

CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: JULY 14, 2015

P.C.:

Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on Board.

This application is moved for relaxation of condition No.(iii) pertaining to attendance in para 4 of the order dated 1.8.2014 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.914 of 2014. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused submits that the applicant/accused was directed to attend the concerned police station on every Monday and every Friday between 6pm to 7pm, till filing of chargesheet. He submits that the chargesheet is not filed by the police till today and since last 1 year, he has been attending the police station as per the order.

Learned APP submits that she has no instructions whether the

chargesheet is filed or not.

1 / 2

appp.357.2015_prodn.1.doc

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the applicant/accused that the applicant/accused is attending the concerned police station on every Monday and every Friday and as the chargesheet is not filed till today, the condition of attendance in the order dated 1.8.2014 is hereby relaxed.

Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

2 / 2

Issues for consideration

2 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the condition of attendance within a specific time frame in the anticipatory bail order be relaxed given the non-filing of the chargesheet.
2.
If the applicant's compliance with the condition of the bail order be relaxed in the absence of a filed chargesheet.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Mohd. Azim Raine
respondent
The State of Maharashtra

Coram

AI extract

MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Bombay HC
Decided on: 14 Jul 2015 · July
Registered: 18 Apr 2015
Case no.: APPP/357/2015
CNR: HCBM010168882015
Topic: Bail and Remand
Bench: Mridula Bhatkar
Disposal: OTHERS DISPOSED OFF

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Mridula Bhatkar

Mr.Nitin@Bappu Ulhas Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra
13 Jul 2015
Shri Arjun Ishwara Gejage Vs the State of Maharashtra
13 Jul 2015
Yogesh Jangale Vs the State of Maharashtra
13 Jul 2015
Dinesh Raosaheb Wayse Vs the State of Maharashtra
14 Jul 2015
Tukaram Ramdas Kadekar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra
14 Jul 2015
Manohar Zambar Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra
14 Jul 2015

Cite this judgement

Mohd Azim Raine v. the State of Maharashtra, APPP/357/2015 (BOM), decided on 14 July 2015.

The Bombay High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

MRS MRIDULA BHATKAR

Parties & counsel